Re: Reading between the lines
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:37 pm
Since Linda started this thread, it seemed apropos to put this here.
Got another email this morning and here it is:
Is that what I said? Are you that sure of yourself? What?...can't you read between the lines? You make statements as if you know me.
Two simple questions that you should be able to answer, not that you ever do answer anything but here it goes. Other than Radomir, just how many individuals have you ever met and to be specific, have you ever met me face to face and have you ever met Linda face to face or anyone else that has posted on the forums or where involved in the meetings over the past several years? (Long question I know but the gist of it in simple terms for you is - who other than Radomir have you met from the forums?)
Next, were you involved in any capacity, other than the forums, in anyway with the situations that have been discussed over these past months?
Let me help you out, the answer is NO on both counts. Therefore, as I said, you are "ignorant". Do you know what ignorant means? A lack of knowledge. Your comments are just showing how stupid you are for you continue to comment when you are ignorant of the facts.
A mask? What about the masks that have been presented to me and to others? What about the individuals that I was introduced to and are NOT what they were said to be? You call what I post as rantings, if so, then what do you call the posts on the Nickel that number more than mine?
Nice description of a game of chess but in my frame, this has been nothing at all as a game of chess but then, it all points to your ignorance again. As to "know(ing) the capabilities of your opponent because it's the same as You have" is not necessarily true. You only have the same armament it is the strategy that wins.
Don't judge lest ye be judged. Acting in ignorance only substantiates the adage that to "act in haste, repent in leisure" appears to be alive and well in some circles. You must have a good deal of leisure time.
Mikado
Got another email this morning and here it is:
kevin wrote:Re: Uncovering masks
by hobbit » Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:02 am
Mikado has replied to Your above post on the hut.
he say's he is replying to am e-mail from Linda munchaeson or something like that?
He is again calling You allsorts and implying that Mr twigsnapper is not real as portrayed.
our friendly little raccoon AM , or AM2 thought something similer.
( how is Radomir???)
Is that what I said? Are you that sure of yourself? What?...can't you read between the lines? You make statements as if you know me.
Two simple questions that you should be able to answer, not that you ever do answer anything but here it goes. Other than Radomir, just how many individuals have you ever met and to be specific, have you ever met me face to face and have you ever met Linda face to face or anyone else that has posted on the forums or where involved in the meetings over the past several years? (Long question I know but the gist of it in simple terms for you is - who other than Radomir have you met from the forums?)
Next, were you involved in any capacity, other than the forums, in anyway with the situations that have been discussed over these past months?
Let me help you out, the answer is NO on both counts. Therefore, as I said, you are "ignorant". Do you know what ignorant means? A lack of knowledge. Your comments are just showing how stupid you are for you continue to comment when you are ignorant of the facts.
kevin wrote:A mask is a veil that someone can hide behind and thus create a false image.
Mikado's whole anger based rantings are obviously made out to be because He reckons all You have said for the past six or seven years is fantasy, that's how it is portrayed , and the removed posts lead anyone reading through the site to be drawn down such a route.
A mask? What about the masks that have been presented to me and to others? What about the individuals that I was introduced to and are NOT what they were said to be? You call what I post as rantings, if so, then what do you call the posts on the Nickel that number more than mine?
kevin wrote:In any chess match You have two equally armed sets of forces opposing each other, both having exactly the same agenda.
There's only a few of us that can recall the actual full postings, and thus who can better puzzle out the hut site now.
Chess is a game of statergy where You know the capabilities of your opponent because it's the same as You have, then it is a case of manouvering the players about to achieve the desired end result... check mate.
When playing this game You often have to sacrifice some of your own parts to lead your opponent into the final trap.
hobbit
Nice description of a game of chess but in my frame, this has been nothing at all as a game of chess but then, it all points to your ignorance again. As to "know(ing) the capabilities of your opponent because it's the same as You have" is not necessarily true. You only have the same armament it is the strategy that wins.
Don't judge lest ye be judged. Acting in ignorance only substantiates the adage that to "act in haste, repent in leisure" appears to be alive and well in some circles. You must have a good deal of leisure time.
Mikado