by Mikado14 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:29 pm
I am going to chime in on the Myles/Blue issue.
If the possibility is greater than 50% or if past experience is to be used in deriving a solution than Occam's Razor indicates that it is Linda.
Blue/David/Morgan/Logan/? has his own login. The question arises as to why he can't post himself? At best, there may be emails back and forth and he offers an opinion and then Linda runs with it. Reminds me of the time at the History Channel when she was posing as wildcard (Mark Culpepper) and going after me. There is no way this person had such personal information from the Huntingdon meeting. In fact, a story as told to Linda about a car with a tag on it was repeated practically word for word as told to Linda and twigsnapper only. Wildcard claimed he was given the intelligence report. The bad thing was, it was a lie. I wanted to see if twigsnapper would correct it and offer the truth. He didn't so I knew I was on my own with no one around. Another incident on the History Channel was a character named Hog Island. Linda has continually claimed that it upsets me about him and I am afraid or some such nonsense. I repeat...again.... I have a cousin who is an attorney in LA and I called in a favor. He was able to get for me through his contacts, the IP's for Hog Island and wildcard. Need I say where they originated? One was a library, one was someones home IP.
Now, I could go on about the ttbrown forum and some of the sock puppets created here when it was first setup....but why?
Based upon my experience, I would say there is greater than a 90%, or more, probability that Linda is Myles and Blue. A common trait in regard to a socio/psychopath is to base characters upon someone they know or have met or even someone in the public eye. It helps to define a real character into a false character, It provides a personality base which in turn improves the reality of said character or the believability, it provides a background so that other characters do not appear hollow or made up.
Lastly, I agree with wags. Anyone who would give up their password...to anyone....has no sense of responsibility or respect for anyone in that they could read all the PMs which are "Private" messages between the sender and receiver. Further, Myles would of had to have Linda's email password as well since he was taking care of the site in her absence, another breach of confidentiality which is proven by how Linda is so quick to post emails even when the sender says it is personal. This indicates a trait that only sustains the socio/psychopathic behavioural pattern.
I do not doubt that individuals flock to Linda which will continue for there a whole lotta of individuals that have not met her or interacted with her but those that are interested in the science will discover that they are chasing a pig in a poke...a phantom in the night.
IMHO
Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.
"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
