Page 16 of 18
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:11 pmby Mikado14
She will not go to any authority. Remember when she accused myself and/or Kim of having someone attempt to murder her daughter but missed and hit the horse? If that were my daughter and I had proof to make such a libelous statement, I would have been to the authorities lickety split.
Hot air.....smelly too.
Mikado
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:21 pmby Mikado14
Talked to "he who Linda refused to meet so she could claim his non-existence" this morning. He told me took up the word minionator and I would find something interesting.
1. They infiltrate people's lives, gathering data about them as if building an official file.
2. They use promises and flattery to draw people in, telling others what they know they want to hear.
3. They are focused on gaining the approval of others and maintaining a certain impression.
4. They create artificially intimate relationships in which they define the other as "the conspiratorial confidant."
5. They maintain, by contrast, an aura of mystery about themselves, and misdirect others who probe too deeply.
6. They refuse to admit to blame (unless it will gain them something) and prefer to point fingers at others when confronted.
7. They cause trouble passive-aggressively, or suddenly suffer from 'selective memory,' to avoid being confronted for their misdeeds.
8. They realize what THEY do to others, and have many enemies from their past, and so end up paranoid.
9. They learn what bothers you so they can push your buttons, both to gain leverage and to entertain themselves.
10. They isolate their victims to foster dependency and/or to prevent others from lending their targets any support.
Now who might this sound like? Eight directly provable points by example over time out of ten and those could show repeated use as well.
Look at her recent use of my full name. Nice try missy. I really don't give a crap what you do.
And this little tidbit. Kim told me that ecker is claiming 20 years of knowing you?.....really? Where the fuck was he from the beginning of Paul writing the book until just a few years ago? Where was he from at least two trips to Vegas? How come we never heard about his lifetime work on Gravitics? I haven't asked Andrew but I will as to if he ever heard of him, I mean after all, if he is claiming such a close and intimate relationship then Andrew should know him, otherwise, I think the whole shenanigan fits somewhere in the list above.
Quite possible they are all congregating around the water hole but then I thought they traveled alone? Guess I missed that BBC special.
Mikado
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Sat Nov 15, 2014 4:54 pmby kevin
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Sat Nov 15, 2014 6:44 pmby Mikado14
Here you go Linda, I asked:
"Close ? No, just one of the people around. He may have been around the UFO circuit for 20 years, but he was hardly involved more than peripherally at best. Linda Leach wrote to a lot of people over the years, so I'm sure she could dig up some old emails between them if pressed. It's just within the past few years that she's found him as a willing acolyte (to fill the void)."
Exactly as I predicted.
Mikado
PS: The redhead is Victoria Steele.......(3 min worth of laughing)....and the other one is Jason...you know...the one you were talking to...supposedly talking with in regard to Pladuim....what a freakin' liar you are...no...sorry....let's just say you can spin a good yarn!
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2014 12:12 pmby Mikado14
wags wrote:If she really thinks the speaker belongs to George, then go to police and claim it otherwise she should "Shut the F*&^ Up!".
Of course she has not got any case and resorts to libel instead.
Hey wags.....Linda Leach is claiming either Kim or I made this post.
Is she really that stupid? How could I login as you without changing the password? And then how would I know what it was to change it back? The only way I can assume is to hack into the PHP and I know I can't do that....
Next she will say you gave me the password....she is such a chooch
Mikado
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2014 1:40 pmby wags
Leech asked:-
And here is a question I would like one of the many HUT members to answer.
ttownsendbrown.com
Why is it alright for (Name Redacted) to have a major thread title that has in it the phrase
"TO SUSTANTIATE THE LYING ACTIONS OF LINDA BROWN." ( paraphrasing here, please look them up yourself ).
I have looked and cannot find any thread with that title.
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2014 1:40 pmby wags
Leech asked:-
And here is a question I would like one of the many HUT members to answer.
ttownsendbrown.com
Why is it alright for (Name Redacted) to have a major thread title that has in it the phrase
"TO SUSTANTIATE THE LYING ACTIONS OF LINDA BROWN." ( paraphrasing here, please look them up yourself ).
I have looked and cannot find any thread with that title.
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2014 1:47 pmby wags
Mikado14 wrote:wags wrote:If she really thinks the speaker belongs to George, then go to police and claim it otherwise she should "Shut the F*&^ Up!".
Of course she has not got any case and resorts to libel instead.
Hey wags.....Linda Leach is claiming either Kim or I made this post.
Is she really that stupid? How could I login as you without changing the password? And then how would I know what it was to change it back? The only way I can assume is to hack into the PHP and I know I can't do that....
Next she will say you gave me the password....she is such a chooch
Mikado
It is possible but it plausible, let alone probable and certainly I not proven that you did. 
What if I was you all along, I mean it really is quite plausible.....
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:38 pmby kevin
wags wrote:Leech asked:-
And here is a question I would like one of the many HUT members to answer.
ttownsendbrown.com
Why is it alright for (Name Redacted) to have a major thread title that has in it the phrase
"TO SUSTANTIATE THE LYING ACTIONS OF LINDA BROWN." ( paraphrasing here, please look them up yourself ).
I have looked and cannot find any thread with that title.
It is not a specific thread, but the whole forum which is described as such.
Thus any thread within this forum section falls under such a banner.
Thats one of the reasons for this thread....as I for one don't have a clue who if anyone is lying.
Kevin
Re: No Clue Clan
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:42 pmby wags
kevin wrote:wags wrote:Leech asked:-
And here is a question I would like one of the many HUT members to answer.
ttownsendbrown.com
Why is it alright for (Name Redacted) to have a major thread title that has in it the phrase
"TO SUSTANTIATE THE LYING ACTIONS OF LINDA BROWN." ( paraphrasing here, please look them up yourself ).
I have looked and cannot find any thread with that title.
It is not a specific thread, but the whole forum which is described as such.
Thus any thread within this forum section falls under such a banner.
Thats one of the reasons for this thread....as I for one don't have a clue who if anyone is lying.
Kevin
Thanks Kevin,
We have thousands of clues, that dowsing rods are overwhelmed.