.......she just doesn't get it.
Here is her latest:
http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 330#p31330Linda Leach wrote:Re: All about Helen Towt!
Postby Linda Brown » Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:28 am
And the other thing that I find extremely odd is...... why did Mikado choose to make such strident remarks about Helen? What was it to him? Why did he find the Huntingdon reports and why had Huntingdon already have some meaning to him? I am sure that there is a link there (but we just haven't seen it yet.)
In his responses its almost as if Mikado immediately set himself to discredit the entire subject of Helen Towt and their response to you as a new member on the HUT... with ties to Helen. was really disgraceful........You, according to KIM on the HUT ... do not exist! You are supposed to be a figment of my imagination just the way that Smith is supposed to be. Why would any of them even bother to make those ridiculous claims, unless it was a custom designed ploy to lead the reading public away from what we have to say.
Thats not going to work.
Linda
Let's reiterate what has been said in the past, almost two years ago.
Some facts:
1. I was told about the newspaper report from Geoff and he sent the link
2. The fact it was a Huntingdon newspaper is due to the fact that it was an AP (Associated Press) newswire. In fact, if one does a Google search they will find the accident listed in other newspapers. It just happens that at the time the search was done, the Huntingdon paper came up. Since then, the Zanesville paper has been converted to data.
3. The point that was being made was that Linda, supposedly, wrote about this in her journal and Paul took it from there. Since the facts surrounding what Linda wrote in her journal differed from facts reported in newspapers of the time makes the case and begs the question as to other stories from her journals as to accuracy.
4. The story was substantiated by twigsnapper on the ttbrown forum as to the veracity of what was reported by Linda's journals. Since that veracity is not only in question but has been proven totally inaccurate, what does that say about other stories that twigsnapper endorsed?
Linda Leach, as always, misses the point of the exercise of posting the information. She is attempting to make a case that it was to discredit Helen Towt. That is not true, and I want every freakin' bot to pick this up, it was all about Linda using Helen Towt for the furtherance of her story, the story that is so full of holes and cannot be verified and can only be tested on the veracity of her statements which in the end, was the purpose of discussing Helen Towt.
Maybe I should start posting information as to her parents divorce, let her argue with legal documents, of course she will because afterall, it is a conspiracy.....right?
As to figments of imagination, no one said that Dave Smith is a figment, you are flat out lying when you make such a statement. What was said is that he is NOT Morgan and by his own admission to several individuals. At least he told the truth. The character Morgan is a figment as well as twigsnapper and an entire cast of players.
As to someone being treated unfairly, who would that be Ravenshine?
Ravenshine does not appear on the membership. Another lie or a misdirection to make a derogatory statement?
Mikado
PS: Why is Linda Leach coming here, taking pieces of posts but not giving the proper citations? Apparently, she intends to "obfuscate" (like that word Linda?) where the post is for there is no search option unless you login. Liars figure and she is good at that....have a nice day missy!