I detect NINE parallel lines, in three sets of three.
3,6,9
http://www.ivarta.com/columns/OL_050307.htm
Vimanas....sanskrit.
Fibonacci.
Kevin
kevin wrote:Steve Clarke,
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/bury ... tchet.html
Then it needs explaing why and if the hatchet would ever go to the middle of the Earth.
You can't go up, unlessYou know why things go down.
Confusiscious Kevin
wags wrote:kevin wrote:Steve Clarke,
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/bury ... tchet.html
Then it needs explaing why and if the hatchet would ever go to the middle of the Earth.
You can't go up, unlessYou know why things go down.
Confusiscious Kevin
The 'middle' of the Earth is not the centre of gravity. it lies about 1000km below the surface in line with the moon. It is called the Barry Point. The two celestial spheres (Earth and Moon) orbit this. Of course if one accepts that the spheres are not indeed flat! I do agree however that Gravity os not a force but a topological feature of space that gives an appearance of force. This is perhaps why Anti Gravity is elusive as in that description anti gravity would be inverted space, which is what Matter appears to have qualities of. But I am of course speculating here.
kevin wrote:wags wrote:kevin wrote:Steve Clarke,
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/bury ... tchet.html
Then it needs explaing why and if the hatchet would ever go to the middle of the Earth.
You can't go up, unlessYou know why things go down.
Confusiscious Kevin
The 'middle' of the Earth is not the centre of gravity. it lies about 1000km below the surface in line with the moon. It is called the Barry Point. The two celestial spheres (Earth and Moon) orbit this. Of course if one accepts that the spheres are not indeed flat! I do agree however that Gravity os not a force but a topological feature of space that gives an appearance of force. This is perhaps why Anti Gravity is elusive as in that description anti gravity would be inverted space, which is what Matter appears to have qualities of. But I am of course speculating here.
Wags,
"Barry" whoever He is will be most offended to think His huge mass creates such an effect.
I fink You mean...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycentre
It is central to My own personal comprehension of what is at play to view such assumptions as absurd.
The mass of the moon is created in the geometries of the overlapping field rotating vortexs, especially those of the earth and the sun, hence it appears to cover the sun at eclipses.
I do not have the descriptive abilities to compete against such entrenched assumption based theories so firmly presented as facts.
Mass is a consequence of the compression into 3D of consciousness, and We are currently veiled from this understanding by the religions called sciences, they demand compliance, and just as all religions are assumption based so is current sciences.
Kevin
kevin wrote:wags wrote:kevin wrote:Steve Clarke,
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/bury ... tchet.html
Then it needs explaing why and if the hatchet would ever go to the middle of the Earth.
You can't go up, unlessYou know why things go down.
Confusiscious Kevin
The 'middle' of the Earth is not the centre of gravity. it lies about 1000km below the surface in line with the moon. It is called the Barry Point. The two celestial spheres (Earth and Moon) orbit this. Of course if one accepts that the spheres are not indeed flat! I do agree however that Gravity os not a force but a topological feature of space that gives an appearance of force. This is perhaps why Anti Gravity is elusive as in that description anti gravity would be inverted space, which is what Matter appears to have qualities of. But I am of course speculating here.
Wags,
"Barry" whoever He is will be most offended to think His huge mass creates such an effect.
I fink You mean...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycentre
It is central to My own personal comprehension of what is at play to view such assumptions as absurd.
The mass of the moon is created in the geometries of the overlapping field rotating vortexs, especially those of the earth and the sun, hence it appears to cover the sun at eclipses.
I do not have the descriptive abilities to compete against such entrenched assumption based theories so firmly presented as facts.
Mass is a consequence of the compression into 3D of consciousness, and We are currently veiled from this understanding by the religions called sciences, they demand compliance, and just as all religions are assumption based so is current sciences.
Kevin
kevin wrote:<snip>
Mass is a consequence of the compression into 3D of consciousness, and We are currently veiled from this understanding by the religions called sciences, they demand compliance, and just as all religions are assumption based so is current sciences.
Kevin
Mikado14 wrote:kevin wrote:<snip>
Mass is a consequence of the compression into 3D of consciousness, and We are currently veiled from this understanding by the religions called sciences, they demand compliance, and just as all religions are assumption based so is current sciences.
Kevin
Under aether theories as well as Brown's Structure of Space, matter is a consequence of the aether compressing it. Mass is a result of areas of High Kμ.
Mikado
Return to The Cosmic Hypocrite
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests